The Political Plan

IIT Roorkee Controversy Part 2: “₹72 Lakh Public Money Lost” – Anant Guha Mittal’s Explosive Claims Continue What happens when innovation collides with power and silence? In the second part of his now-viral exposé, engineer and content creator Anant Guha Mittal makes a deeply concerning claim — not just about personal struggle, but about the alleged loss of ₹72 lakh of public money. His story is no longer just about one disrupted project; it raises uncomfortable questions about accountability, institutional integrity, and the future of innovation in India. To understand the full picture, it is important to revisit the first part of this controversy. In Part 1, Mittal explained how he developed a bio-refinery process that uses bacteria instead of harsh chemicals to extract precious metals like gold and rare earth elements from e-waste. This innovation had the potential to reduce India’s dependence on imports while also addressing the growing problem of ...

Priyanka Chopra and the Beef Controversy: A Case of Double Standards? A significant point of contention has emerged following reports of Priyanka Chopra discussing her dietary habits on international platforms. In specific clips, including discussions on high-profile podcasts like Joe Rogan and Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard , the actress has been noted for her openness regarding Western lifestyle choices. The "Houston Podcast" and the Beef Admission In a widely circulated discussion, Priyanka allegedly spoke about enjoying beef while in the United States, specifically mentioning her time in Houston . For her critics in India, this is viewed as a calculated move to gain "Western validation" by appearing fully assimilated into American culture. The Contrast: While in India, Priyanka is frequently seen visiting high-profile temples—such as the Kashi Vishwanath or Ram Mandir —and performing Bhakti-filled rituals. The Criticism: Fans argue that showing deep religi...

What happens when one of India’s most popular educators takes a direct jab at the media? In a viral 56-second clip now dominating khan sir news and khan sir exposed media discussions, Khan Sir uses sharp sarcasm to paint a striking picture — a national crisis ignored, and instead, viewers being sold “benefits” of hardship. His bold commentary doesn’t just entertain; it taps into a deeper public frustration about media narratives, making this moment far more than just another viral video. Khan Sir brutally roasts the Indian Media "If the Strait of Hormuz is closed for 10 days, Indian media will make you count the benefits of cooking food on wood" Infact Sudhir Chaudhary will be the 1st to tell you the benefits of cooking on wood. pic.twitter.com/0ej0ElqxjU — Nehr_who? (@Nher_who) March 18, 2026 The clip runs for about 56 seconds and features Khan Sir (real name: Khan Sir from Patna, Bihar — a highly popular educator known for his history and polity lectures, motivational ...

Analysis: Dhruv Rathee, “Neutrality,” and the Real Cost of Silence in Global Conflicts In a viral short clip circulating on X (formerly Twitter), YouTuber Dhruv Rathee delivers a sharp critique of what he calls “so-called neutrality” in the escalating Iran–Israel conflict —a situation increasingly entangled with United States –Iran tensions. While global diplomacy often feels like a distant game played by politicians, a viral 90-second critique from Dhruv Rathee has brought the Iran-Israel conflict right to the Indian kitchen table. By challenging the government's stance of "neutrality," the debate has shifted from foreign policy to a much more urgent question: Is our silence actually protecting us, or is it secretly driving up the prices of our fuel and daily essentials? But beyond the viral outrage, the debate raises a deeper question: Is neutrality in today’s interconnected world even possible—or is it simply a convenient political shield? तथाकथित तटस्थ लोकांना चांग...

Selective Outrage: The Double Standard in India’s "National Security" Reporting The situation involving the X (formerly Twitter) follow of Matthew VanDyke by the official handle of the Office of Nirmala Sitharaman and BJP leader Rajeev Chandrashekhar has sparked significant social media controversy following VanDyke's arrest by the NIA. While there hasn't been an official statement from the Finance Minister’s office, here is the breakdown of why such follows typically occur and the context of this specific incident: He is being followed by Finance Minster N Sitharaman’s office handle. https://t.co/vHGUrnzUG4 pic.twitter.com/GXyWgD3Zrz — Diksha Kandpal🇮🇳 (@DikshaKandpal8) March 17, 2026 1. Managed by Social Media Teams Official handles like @FinMinIndia or the "Office of" accounts are rarely managed personally by the ministers. They are handled by digital agencies, social media cells, or PR staffers. These teams often follow a broad range of internatio...

Gemini said The 0.07% Dissent: Why Kim Jong Un Just "Allowed" No Votes The 2026 North Korean parliamentary election has produced a result that is, on the surface, statistically impossible for a dictatorship: 99.93% approval . While a 0.07% rejection rate sounds like a rounding error, in the context of Pyongyang’s political history, it is an earthquake. For decades, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has touted a "perfect" 100% participation and 100% approval record. By officially reporting "No" votes for the first time in an SPA election since 1957, Kim Jong Un is signaling a shift in how North Korea wants to be perceived by the world. A History of "Perfection" (1948–2026) Historically, North Korean elections have functioned as a mandatory political census rather than a democratic choice. The 100% Era: Since the late 1950s, state media typically reported that 100% of voters participated and 100% voted for the pre-selected candidate...